Skip to main content

When all you get are empty words

The Chamber
The late Edward M. Kennedy is often known as Ted Kennedy, or, more often still as the younger brother of Jack Kennedy, our 35THpresident, and younger brother of Bobby Kennedy, who might have been our 37thpresident, had he not been tragically killed.

In his (Ted’s) book True Compass, his defining autobiography written almost in his final days of life, Ted Kennedy speaks of his first days in the senate as a freshman senator just barely old enough to hold the seat. And he speaks of another, famous senator whom he himself no doubt admired giving a rousing speech in favor of a bill. This famous senator went on about how everyone should vote for it, how it was imperative that they vote for it., that they must vote for it. He then promptly sat down and himself voted no.
Kennedy was surprised, and asked the senator why he had done this. The senator responded “my state is evenly split on this topic. To those that are for this bill I will send them my speech, to those that oppose it I will send them my vote.”
The most disturbing thing about the story is that it’s not that disturbing. As that now forgotten senator voted on that now forgotten bill he probably thought he was doing himself a favor, he was getting other people’s votes and they thought they were getting a good deal. It’s a thing that is still a problem today, perhaps even more of a problem than it was then. We elect people to go to congress to get things done, not play golf or patty cake. But the gridlock and the problems continue.
Congress is well known for not being well liked, just today, their disapproval rating stands at near 80%, but also, notoriously, while people don’t like congress, they like their congressman, or woman, usually because they are giving them their speech, if not their vote. At election time, and throughout the year while we are watching congress, remember this, why should I give them my vote, if they don’t give me theirs?

Andrew C. Abbott

Comments

Popular Posts

Create Your Own Social Networking Site

Create Your Own Social Networking Site JCOW: Ethical Hacking Top 10 reasons to choose Jcow:- 1. Handle more traffic - Clean codes and Dynamic caching can lower the CPU load and  speed up your website. 2 Make your site more interactive - Well designed Jcow applications help you members to connect and communicate with others more effectively. 3 Add questions to the Registration Form - You can add new member fields, which will be displayed to the registration form, profile form, and the member browsing form. 4 Easily share stuff - Within the AJAX sharing Box, your members can publish status,  photos, videos, and blogs. 5 Customize and Extend your Jcow Network - A Jcow network consists of core apps(like "Friends" and "Messages") and optional apps(like "Blogs" and ""Videos"). You can enable/disable optional apps. You can also develop your own apps. 6 Every profile could be Unique - Members can customize their own profile theme and  add music play...

The Problem of Abstraction in Definitions of Data Objects

I think there is a major problem in not being able to understand and work with different levels of abstraction.  By "abstraction" in this sense I mean one concept system that somehow describes or defines (not merely relates to) another concept system.  I think this is a big problem for definitions in data models. Let us take an example in a retail business such as mortgage banking: Customer Name.  Customer Name exists in the business.  They use it all the time.  Maybe it is sometimes called Borrower Name, but the concept is the same.  This is the Level 1 abstraction. Now let us think of data values in a column in a table that holds Customer Name.  These data values are stored as a code of 1's and 0's.  Of course these bits are rendered into something we can read.  However, this is not the same as the Customer Name in the business.  I worked for a place where they prefixed the name of anyone who had recently left with "ZZZ"....

The Humpty-Dumpty Principle in Definitions

In dealing with empty concepts, we came across the issue that if somebody uses a term that potentially has an unintelligible definition, they are likely to defend themselves by quickly making up some kind of definition.   I strongly suspect that in such cases, the usage of the term will be inconsistent with the definition.  Which brings us to Humpty-Dumpty. Lewis Carroll (Rev. Charles Lutwidge Dodgson) is best known for his children's' books Alice's Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking Glass .  It is in the latter that Humpty Dumpty - an argumentative egg perched on a wall has the following exchange with Alice: 'And only one for birthday presents, you know. There's glory for you!' `I don't know what you mean by "glory",' Alice said. Humpty Dumpty smiled contemptuously. `Of course you don't -- till I tell you. I meant "there's a nice knock-down argument for you!"' `But "glory" doesn't mean "...